
THIS SITE USES GOOGLE ANALYTICS TO ANALYSE TRAFFIC. CONTINUING TO USE THIS SITE MEANS YOU ACCEPT THE USE OF COOKIES.WE DO NOT COLLECT PERSONAL DATA LEARN MORE OR SEE OUR PRIVACY POLICY
SEVEN DAY CYCLIST
CYCLING, BUT NOT USUALLY RACING
LATEST UPDATE SEPTEMBER 5th.
HOW DO WE REACH THE OVERALL RATINGS FOR PRODUCTS WE REVIEW?
Sidi Aertis MTB Shoes
674g (Size 44 as tested) £175.00
The Sidi Aertis MTB Shoes are aimed at cross country mountain biking audiences but thanks to the slightly more compliant, grippy sole and stability make easy transition to gravel, bike packing and indeed touring.
​
Though more compliant than some race slippers, power transfer is still excellent and plenty stiff enough for competitive riding and the optional studs offers some potential for winter ‘cross and similar events. Comfort generally is excellent, but in common with other performance orientated shoes, weather resistance is good, rather than great.
Pros: Sole gives excellent balance of pedalling efficiency and walkability, temperate in hot weather, subtle styling, rugged construction and grippy sole also lends them to winter road training.
​
Cons: Relatively pricey, studs not included.

Specification
The Aertis are available in men and women specific versions. Ours are the monochrome but two-tone “Army yellow” and multi colour (black with bold secondary colours) and for the ladies, a matt sand/coral.
​
The MTB SR17 sole features within the range and comprises of nylon with polyurethane studs around the heel and forefoot areas. A rubberised Sidi logo continues the grippy theme. There’s a replaceable toe insert, and the studs are an aftermarket option and aren’t included with the shoes. Talking inserts, these are reckoned to be special MTB. Beyond the Ride Sidi message, they’re lightly shaped but with very subtle support around the heel. I should point out that Sidi doesn’t have a sole stiffness chart, so difficult to make on-paper comparisons with others.
​
As for the uppers, these are “Politex” - a synthetic suede, which feels quite convincing to touch, although much lower maintenance.
​
I’m told it’s made of several overlapping layers with unique physical-mechanical qualities. The compacted PVC is then joined to two fabrics- a knitted fabric and a “felt”. This is then fill dyed for lasting colour retention. Firmly adhering to EU regulations, its supposedly a “green” product, highly resistant to rips, laceration, stretching and fading.
However, being as synthetic hides generally lack the same breathability, there’s a generous perforation throughout. It feels reassuringly rugged and as we’d hope given the price point, stitching is similarly sturdy and uniform throughout. Reinforcement features around the toe box to protect against stubbing against rocks, stones and similarly unexpected trail debris.
​
Surprisingly, dare I say uncharacteristically for Sidi, the contrasting black logos emblazoned across the side are very subtle. More interesting is the Firmore closure system, which is a beefy strap running from the shoe’s centre to the sole’s lateral edge. Last but certainly not least is the Tecno3 closure system, which works to a very similar principle to the Boa type.

It’s similarly ergonomic and offers uniformly consistent cinching the shoe across its length and just like the boa, it’s easily adjusted in the saddle. The tension loosens by pressing the two buttons that sit top and bottom of the dial. To tighten, flip the flap and winding it snug- this operates like a left/right hand thread, which I found counter intuitive coming from the Boa. Seems I’m not the only one, either.
​
However, it’s very reliable and precise. Some have suggested the flap is also prone to collecting grass seeds and similar. In their experience, this can foul the mechanism, making release and minor slackening awkward to the point of frustrating. This hasn’t been an issue for me to date and suggests Sidi has made some subtle revisions to counter this problem.
Sizing/Fit 3.5/5
I’m blessed with relatively long, narrow feet, well suited to performance footwear. That out of the way, I’ve found Sidi’s sizing chart very accurate and basically boiled down to my usual street size plus one. The range of sizes is similarly accommodating from 40-48 for men, 36-43 for women. Fit is best described as snug- the right side of racy for yours truly and despite some shortcomings with the Techno3, there’s a wealth of nuanced adjustment, which aside from the obvious means they’ll entertain different weights of socks, including some racier waterproof designs.

Power Transfer/Sole 3.75/5

Factors such as pedal shape, platform width etc all play their part. I’ve tested ours with Shimano M540, Shimano XT, Leatt 6.0 and the original Spuds from 1990. All broadly similar and none with titanium axles, or similar exotica, but slightly different. True to marketing and indeed, my own expectations, the Aertis have struck an excellent balance between efficiency and comfort. Coming from the FLR F70 Pro MTB M250 the soles had slightly more give and while there was a very slight difference in power transfer, this was welcome after several hours at a steady 90rpm and very close to Shimano RX6, which have been my go-tos since the winter of ‘23 and a very close comparators price-wise.

Though marketed at trail audiences, I’ve done long road outings on “Muffin” my fixed gear winter/trainer, which have involved some steady climbs- even allowing for a slightly lower, 69-inch gear, this means getting out of the saddle and powering. No hot spots or similar discomfort when I’ve been grinding along, placing all my weight on the pedals.
​
Some soles can squeak in these contexts, especially on a hot day. Not the end of the world by any means, but irritating. Moot point here, even when the mercury’s advancing to the high twenties. No hot spots around the balls of my feet and ample support around the heel cup. This narrative remained unchanged when switching to Denise and getting some serious gravel miles in.

In common with the RX6 and FLR, along gravely, unmade roads, the sole’s polyurethane blocks can trap small stones- say if you’ve been shouldering the bike, indulging in a comfort stop, chatting with a donkey ... you get the idea. Easily prized away with a stick, or resin tyre lever for that matter. When the rains came and trails turned softer, I wasn’t surprised to discover, in common with the RX6, they shed mud fairly convincingly, obviously December’s boggiest may say different but thus far, I’m pleasantly surprised.
Breathability/Comfort 3.5/5
Used in temperatures between 11 and 30 degrees was a useful gauge. Worn with merino blend socks and at the lower and middling of the scales, I wasn’t surprised to find them incredibly temperate. The lack of mesh panelling has some disadvantages when temperatures are soaring but even after several hours and wearing the fairly bog-standard merino blends, my feet have never become clammy, or uncomfortable. Sure, I was aware of the rising heat from increasingly softening tarmac, but no issue with hot spots. Perhaps predictably, higher end, summer socks improved the experience somewhat. When rains of biblical proportions arrived, there’s been sufficient room for racier waterproof socks, such as these Dexshell Pro Visibilty, and the perforations will also buy you a little time, should you immerse your foot in a deep, boggy puddle. In torrential rain, wearing merino blend socks, I’ve managed twenty minutes before feet were noticeably wet.

Care/Durability 3.5/5
Ours are holding up very well against the everyday rough n’ tumble of gravel and trail fun, coupled with a generous side order of general road riding. Unlike a genuine suede upper, it’s unaffected by mud, rain and similar. Ours have responded very well to a quick blast of bike wash, tickling with medium soft brush and lukewarm water. Stuff with old newspaper, or old flannels and leave to dry at room temperature. Bargain on several hours, if you’ve got them really soggy, mind. In common with the Boa system, replacements and spares are available, which is very welcome.
Value 3.25/5
Though £175 is hardly small change but this shouldn’t be inferred as meaning poor value and its perhaps worth noting, they’re made in Italy. The Lake MX177 is £25 cheaper, is available in both standard and wide versions and as similarly generous range of sizes (36-50). There; s a choice of two colours-black and beetle/black microfibre uppers and Boa closures. Lake also claims the injection nylon sole offers uncompromising performance and comfort.
​
We’ve not tested them, so can’t comment. Shimano RX600 Gravel are a firm favourite of mine but while I’ve found them very competent in a cross-country mountain biking context, not to mention more general riding, there’s no option for fitting studs. Arguably the Sidi’s closest rivals are Specialized Recon 2.0, which feature a Boa closure, welded uppers and a performance orientated, yet walkable sole.
​
Body Geometry inserts are another definite plus and they’re slightly cheaper at £165, however, there’s no option for studs and we’ve not tested a pair, so cannot make effective, real-world comparisons. You can also pay a good bit more. Quoc Pham Grand Tourer XC come inn at £240, feature a “premium grade” microfibre upper, an in-house dual closure for precision fit. The carbon fibre sole is reckoned to offer the optimal balance of power and compliance. The sole will also accept studs for extra traction in gloopy conditions.
Summary
There’s a wealth of crossover between gravel, cyclo cross, and cross country mountain biking and with it, plenty of shoes that blur these genres. The Sidi Aertis are something of a social chameleon and though relatively expensive, could be the best choice for those who want a shoe that will do both gravel and wintry cross country mountain biking.
Verdict: 3.75/5 Refined, capable shoe for gravel and cross country mountain biking, albeit a little pricey.
Michael Stenning
PUBLISHED SEPTEMBER 2025